每逢佳节胖三斤的妹子 这个套餐拿走不谢哦！

High-frequency trading (HFT) has fundamentally altered limit order book (LOB) dynamics by accelerating the speed of order submissions and cancellations. Competition for speed has led to an HFT “arms race” where traders engage in costly technology upgrades to gain microsecond advantages budish2015armsrace . One consequence of this arms race is the prevalence of fleeting orders or flickering quotes: orders that are placed and then canceled almost immediately, often within milliseconds. Empirical studies find that such fleeting orders are widespread in modern electronic markets and are closely associated with HFT activity ulze2021fleeting . For example, Hasbrouck and Saar document that a significant fraction of orders in the millisecond environment are canceled very quickly (“fleeting”), indicating that many displayed quotes are not intended to be executed hasbrouck2013latency . These rapid-fire order updates can momentarily improve displayed liquidity or test market depth, but they inject substantial noise into the order flow. Indeed, nearly all limit orders ultimately get canceled rather than executed – recent research shows that the vast majority of submitted orders are withdrawn before trading, as traders update their quotes in response to changing information dahlstrom2024cancellations . This environment complicates the extraction of reliable trading signals, since the LOB is cluttered with ephemeral information that may not reflect genuine supply and demand. As a result, researchers and practitioners have considered various filtering techniques to distinguish meaningful order book imbalances from mere noise. For instance, one common approach is to ignore or down-weight quotes that persist for only a few milliseconds, on the premise that such ultra-fast cancellations are strategic and not indicative of true interest. The motivation for filtered order book signals is to enhance signal quality by removing these microstructural artifacts, thereby focusing on more persistent order flow patterns. Market design proposals like frequent batch auctions have even been suggested to inherently reduce the noisy volatility caused by continuous-time racing and flickering quotes budish2015armsrace . Overall, the rise of low-latency trading has improved certain liquidity measures (e.g., tighter spreads and greater depth) hasbrouck2013latency , but it has also introduced high-frequency microstructure noise. This duality has spurred interest in whether filtering the LOB data can better isolate the informative content (e.g,. true buying or selling pressure) from transient fluctuations.

One of the key microstructural indicators for directional price pressure is the order book imbalance (OBI), also often termed order flow imbalance (OFI). OBI generally measures the difference between buy and sell interest in the limit order book, such as the volume (or number of orders) at bid prices versus ask prices. cont2014impact formally introduced a definition of OFI based on detailed order book events, and demonstrated a striking linear relationship between order flow imbalance and short-term price changes. In their empirical analysis, price changes over short intervals were largely explained by the net order imbalance: when buy orders (market buys and limit orders at the bid) exceed sell orders (and cancellations) in aggregate, prices tend to rise, and vice versa. This linear price impact of imbalance had a slope inversely proportional to market depth, consistent with intuition that deeper order books absorb imbalance with less price movement cont2014impact . The predictive power of imbalance has since been corroborated in various markets. For example, hanke2015ofi find significant effects of daily order flow imbalance on returns in the German stock market. Their results show that days with excess buying (positive imbalance) generally see upward price pressure, and they also document that the strength of this effect varies with firm size and liquidity hanke2015ofi . These studies cement the idea that OBI contains valuable information about the likely direction of price moves, making it a natural candidate for trading signals.

In practice, there is evidence that HFT firms and algorithmic traders utilize order book imbalance as part of their strategies. Though proprietary strategies are seldom disclosed, the correlation between OBI and future returns suggests informed traders monitor this metric yagi2023complexity . Yagi et al. simulate an agent-based market in which one agent type engages in an OBI-driven high-frequency strategy, and they confirm that exploiting imbalance can yield a trading advantage yagi2023complexity . In their simulation, an HFT that buys (sells) when the book is bid-imbalanced (ask-imbalanced) realizes profits, albeit with higher volatility – a finding that aligns with the notion that OBI-based strategies are profitable but can carry high risk in turbulent periods. The broader implication is that imbalance signals are indeed directional: a persistently buy-imbalanced book often precedes upward price movements, whereas a sell-imbalanced book presages downward moves. This principle underlies many short-term prediction models in the literature.

Recognizing the importance of imbalance, recent work has focused on extracting even more information from the limit order book beyond a simple aggregate imbalance. kolm2023deepofi propose a multi-horizon and multi-level approach to OBI, dubbed “Deep Order Flow Imbalance.” They construct features that capture imbalance across different layers of the book and across various time scales, and apply deep learning to combine these signals. The study finds that this enriched representation of order flow imbalance can improve the prediction of price movements at horizons ranging from intraday minutes to longer intervals kolm2023deepofi . In essence, while the original OBI measures were scalar summaries (often just considering the best bid/ask or cumulated top levels), the modern approach is to leverage the full depth and temporal evolution of the order book to extract latent signals. This reflects an evolution in signal construction: from simple static imbalances to complex, data-driven representations that capture the depth-wise and time-wise structure of order flow. The success of such models underscores that there is additional alpha to be mined by looking at how imbalance manifests at different scales, but it also raises the bar on data processing and noise reduction, since a multi-level view is even more susceptible to flickering at each price level if not filtered appropriately.

The distinction between filtered and unfiltered OBI signals has become an important practical consideration in high-frequency data analysis. An unfiltered order book signal is computed directly from the raw data stream, counting every order placement, modification, cancellation, or trade that occurs. By contrast, a filtered signal applies criteria to ignore certain transient events or out-of-band quotes so as to capture a cleaner picture of supply and demand. The need for filtering arises from the realization that many order book updates are noise or strategy-induced artifacts. As noted, Ulze et al. find that flickering quotes (orders that flash in and out) can momentarily tighten spreads or give the illusion of depth, only to vanish before any trade occurs ulze2021fleeting . These flickers can cause abrupt swings in a naive imbalance measure computed tick-by-tick. Similarly, the extremely high cancellation rates documented by dahlstrom2024cancellations imply that raw order flow data contain numerous cancellations that quickly negate earlier placements, effectively canceling out their impact. Including all such ephemeral updates in a signal may therefore add volatility without improving informational content.

To address this, researchers have explored filtering methods. A common approach is time-based filtering: for instance, define a quote as fleeting if it persists for less than a certain threshold (e.g. 50 milliseconds), and exclude those from imbalance calculations. This kind of filter was implicitly used in studies like Hasbrouck and Saar’s analysis of low-latency trading, where they categorize fleeting orders as not contributing to genuine liquidity hasbrouck2013latency . Another approach is event-based filtering, such as focusing only on imbalance changes caused by trades (executions) and large persistent orders, rather than every minor cancel/replace event. By doing so, one captures the net order flow that moves the price. In essence, filtered OBI metrics attempt to measure the structural imbalance, the imbalance that remains after fast tactical orders have been removed. While there is no universal filtering standard, empirical work suggests that filtering can substantially stabilize the imbalance signal and improve its correlation with price movements. For example, if one filters out flickering quotes, the resulting OBI time series tends to be smoother and may align more clearly with future price trends (this is often observed in proprietary trading analyses, even if not always formally published).

It should be noted that filtering is not without trade-offs. Aggressive filtering might throw away information, as some fleeting orders could be placed by informed traders testing the market. The academic literature has begun to grapple with these issues: recent studies highlight the importance of understanding HFT order add-and-cancel patterns when designing predictive signals. For instance, budish2015armsrace argues that many rapid order updates are symptomatic of the race conditions in continuous markets, implying that a more coarse-time market structure (batches) could naturally filter out meaningless micro-events. Meanwhile, yagi2023complexity and others illustrate that the effectiveness of an imbalance-based strategy can depend on market conditions, in highly volatile “flash crash” scenarios, even a filtered signal may fail, as market dynamics break down in extreme ways. Consequently, ongoing research often evaluates signal quality under different filtering schemes to ensure robustness. In summary, the consensus emerging is that unfiltered OBI signals reflect the noisy reality of high-frequency order flow, whereas filtered OBI signals aim to extract the enduring informational content by removing the shortest-lived, potentially spurious order book fluctuations. Careful filtration thus appears to enhance directional signal quality in many high-frequency trading applications, though the optimal filtering rules may vary by market and strategy.

Beyond handcrafted signals, researchers have developed statistical models to capture the dynamics of order flow and imbalance in a more principled way. A prominent class of such models treats the sequence of order book events (limit orders, market orders, cancellations) as realizations of point processes (random event sequences in continuous time). Early work by bowsher2007modelling applied multivariate point process models to financial market events, using intensity functions (hazard rates) that could depend on the history of order arrivals. This intensity-based framework allowed for analyzing how the occurrence of one type of event (say, a trade) affects the short-term probability of another event (like a cancellation or a quote update). Building on this, a particularly influential model class in recent years has been Hawkes processes, introduced originally by hawkes1971spectra . Hawkes processes are self-exciting point processes, meaning each event increases the rate of future events for some period, thereby generating clustered event arrivals. This property maps well to order book dynamics, where trades and orders tend to cluster in bursts of activity.

In market microstructure, Hawkes processes have been extensively used to model order flows and even price changes. bacry2015hawkes provides a comprehensive overview of Hawkes process applications in finance, noting that these models can reproduce stylized facts such as heavy-tailed volume clustering and volatility clustering. For example, a Hawkes model can be fitted to the arrival times of market orders and limit orders; a significant self-excitation parameter would indicate that a flurry of buy orders tends to trigger further buy orders, capturing a feedback loop often associated with trend momentum or order anticipation. hardiman2013reflexivity use Hawkes processes to analyze the reflexivity of financial markets, essentially, how order flow can become self-reinforcing. They find that certain market events exhibit cascade effects consistent with a self-exciting process, which provides a statistical description of phenomena like herding or positive feedback in order flow. However, modeling high-frequency data with Hawkes processes is not without challenges. filimonov2015hawkes caution that standard Hawkes model calibrations can misinterpret long-memory in order flows as “critical” self-excitation. They show that improper inference can falsely suggest that the system is on the verge of an unstable chain reaction, whereas in reality the persistence might be due to structural features or exogenous influences. This highlights the need for careful specification and calibration when applying point process models to LOB data.

Extensions of the basic Hawkes framework have also been proposed to incorporate more information. For instance, Rambaldi et al. develop a multivariate Hawkes process that includes order volume as part of the state, thus enriching the model beyond mere event timing bacry2016volume . Their analysis, focusing on how the size of orders influences future activity, suggests that volume plays a significant role in the excitation: a large trade can trigger a series of subsequent orders (potentially as other participants react to the large trade), a dynamic that a volume-aware Hawkes model can capture. As the dimensionality of these models grows (multiple event types, volume levels, etc.), traditional parametric estimation becomes complex. In response, researchers have turned to machine learning for help. joseph2023neural propose a neural network-based model for multi-dimensional nonlinear Hawkes processes. By using neural networks to flexibly parametrize the excitation kernel (the function that governs how one event influences the future rate of events), they can capture nonlinear dependencies and interactions between a wide array of order flow events. Such a model can, for example, learn if a burst of small buy orders followed by one large sell order creates a different excitation pattern than vice versa, nuances that would be hard to pre-specify in a classical model. These advanced point process models represent a shift from static signal indicators like OBI to dynamic modeling of imbalance: instead of outputting a single imbalance number, the model encodes the history of order flow and can forecast the likelihood of future imbalance events (e.g., predict a spike of buy orders incoming). The advantage is a more holistic use of the data, though the complexity is significantly higher.

Another vein of literature approaches high-frequency market dynamics through the lens of regimes and structural models that mimic the LOB mechanism. These models acknowledge that market behavior may change over time, for instance, alternating between calm periods and frenzy periods and that the LOB is essentially a queuing system with strategic agents. Regime-switching models explicitly allow model parameters to change according to a latent state (regime). li2023regimeswitching develops a multi-factor regime-switching model for inter-trade durations in a limit order market. In their framework, the arrival rate of trades (and possibly other order types) switches between different states, such as a high-intensity state and a low-intensity state, driven by underlying factors. They find that such a model fits high-frequency data better than a single-regime (homogeneous) process, capturing the intuition that markets can abruptly shift into faster or slower gears li2023regimeswitching . These regime shifts might correspond to events like news releases or simply endogenous bursts of activity. Importantly for signal extraction, a regime-switching perspective implies that the reliability of signals like OBI could vary by regime, e.g., in a volatile regime, imbalance might need to be interpreted differently than in a steady regime. While Li et al. focus on trade arrival times, the approach can be extended to volumes and imbalances, allowing a richer understanding of how imbalance dynamics behave under different market conditions.

In parallel, researchers have constructed structural models that simulate the mechanics of order books. One influential model is the queue-reactive model proposed by huang2015queue . This model treats the LOB as a collection of queues (one for each price level on each side) and assumes that order arrival and cancellation rates at a given price level depend on the current state of the LOB (such as the queue lengths at that level and neighboring levels). In other words, the placement/cancellation of limit orders is reactive to the existing queue sizes, for example, traders might be more inclined to join a shorter queue (closer to the front of the line for execution) or cancel if their order is too far back in a long queue. By calibrating such a model to data, one can generate synthetic order flow that reproduces realistic patterns (like the distribution of order lifetimes, spread dynamics, etc.). The queue-reactive model provides insights into structural dynamics, such as how imbalances build up and dissipate as a result of many agents’ decisions. Recent work by bodor2024queue extends this approach by incorporating the sizes of orders into the model. In the original formulation, an order was essentially a unit in the queue; Bodor and Carlier recognize that real orders come in varying sizes, which can influence how queues evolve (e.g., a large order at the best bid might deter other buy orders behind it or invite stronger sell competition). Their extended model shows that accounting for order sizes can materially affect the predicted LOB dynamics, thus refining our understanding of how volume contributes to imbalance and liquidity fluctuations bodor2024queue .

Agent-based models (ABMs) offer another structural perspective by explicitly simulating different types of market participants and their strategies. Instead of a statistical law for event arrivals, an ABM specifies behavior rules for agents (e.g., market makers, momentum traders, HFTs) and lets them interact in a simulated exchange. The study by yagi2023complexity , mentioned earlier for its use of an OBI-based HFT agent, is a prime example of using an ABM to examine structural implications of a strategy. In their model, alongside the OBI-sensitive HFT, there are other agent types (possibly fundamental investors or market makers), and the exchange matches orders in a continuous double auction as in real markets. This approach can recreate complex phenomena like flash crashes or liquidity droughts as emergent outcomes of interactions. Yagi et al. find that when the market is in a stable regime, the presence of an OBI-driven HFT tends to stabilize prices by actively providing liquidity in the direction of imbalance (buying when others are selling, and vice versa), which can dampen short-term volatility yagi2023complexity . However, during a simulated flash crash scenario, the same OBI strategy did not prevent the crash, importantly, it also did not exacerbate it. This suggests that while OBI-informed HFTs might normally support price discovery and liquidity, their influence can vanish in extreme events when all agents pull back. Such findings contribute to the long-standing debate on whether HFT is a source of market instability or not; the answer may be state-dependent, echoing the idea of regimes.

The evolution of the literature from simple indicators to complex models reflects a growing appreciation of the layered structure in high-frequency markets. Early studies established basic signals like order imbalance and demonstrated their relevance for price prediction. As markets grew faster and more complex, issues of data quality (noise vs signal) prompted efforts to filter and refine these indicators. Concurrently, more sophisticated models, from point processes to agent-based simulations, have been developed to capture the generative processes behind the data. These models offer deeper insights: for instance, a point process model might reveal how an imbalance signal decays over time (via self-excitation decay), whereas a queuing model can show how an imbalance at the top of the book might be quickly offset by strategic order placement. Each approach, whether empirical or theoretical, contributes to a holistic understanding of filtered versus unfiltered OBI and directional signal quality. Taken together, the surveyed literature highlights that effective signal extraction in high-frequency trading requires both robust data handling (to filter out noise) and robust modeling (to interpret the underlying dynamics). The most recent advances, such as deep learning-based signal construction and hybrid models, continue to push this frontier, aiming to harness the rich information in LOB data while overcoming the challenges posed by its complexity and noise.

Although theoretical frameworks have evolved to capture endogenous dynamics through point process models bacry2015hawkes ; hardiman2013reflexivity ; bowsher2007modelling and regime-switching behavior li2023regimeswitching , empirical studies rarely account for heterogeneity in order persistence. Most treatments implicitly assume that all observable events are equally informative. This motivates a fundamental question: Can directional signals be improved by filtering the LOB based on real-time observable properties such as order survival and update frequency?

This paper makes four primary contributions to answer that question:

1. 1.

   Contemporaneous Correlation Analysis. We show that filtration enhances the Pearson correlation between raw OBI signals and traded returns. This establishes filtration as an effective tool for improving directional signal clarity at the value level.

2. 2.

   Explanatory Power under Discretized Regimes. We discretize both OBI and returns into categorical regimes and evaluate their relationship using (i) the correlation between regime counts of OBI and the direction of price movement, and (ii) a multivariate regression where return regimes are regressed on OBI regimes. Filtration enhances explanatory power, as quantified by an autoregression-adjusted $R^{2}$.

3. 3.

   Causal Coherence. Using a multivariate Hawkes process, we estimate cross-excitation between OBI and return regimes and show that filtration amplifies the directional excitation norm while suppressing spurious self-excitation. This reveals a cleaner causal structure between filtered imbalance and price movements.

4. 4.

   Comparative Filter Evaluation. We implement and benchmark multiple filtration schemes, including lifetime thresholds, modification counts, and modification-time filters, and find that different filters improve different aspects of signal quality across the diagnostic ladder.

We implement a structured empirical pipeline on high-frequency LOB data from BANKNIFTY index futures. The filtering approach targets structurally transient activity by removing orders that reflect fleeting, deceptive, or noncommittal intent. Three distinct mechanisms are evaluated, each grounded in real-time observable features:

1. 1.

   Lifetime based filtering, which discards orders that survive for less than a threshold duration,

2. 2.

   Modification count filtering, which excludes orders subject to frequent updates, and

3. 3.

   Modification time filtering, which retains only those orders whose time between successive updates exceeds a minimum threshold.

Each mechanism refines the event stream to emphasize execution relevant liquidity, and the OBI signal is recomputed on the filtered data accordingly. The directional informativeness of the resulting signal is then evaluated using a layered diagnostic framework.

In addition to filtered and unfiltered imbalance measures derived from order flow updates, we also compute an alternative form of imbalance based exclusively on executed trades. This benchmark, referred to as OBI from trade events, is defined as the signed volume difference between market buy and sell executions within each evaluation window. Unlike traditional OBI measures constructed from limit order placements and cancellations, trade-based OBI reflects realized demand and supply as expressed through actual transactions. While this measure is not derived from the visible state of the limit order book, it provides a valuable counterpoint for causal evaluation. By construction, trade-based OBI captures directional conviction that results in execution, and is thus less susceptible to noise introduced by flickering quotes or non-executed strategic activity. As such, it serves as a meaningful reference when assessing the causal coherence of filtered imbalance signals with price movement?nittur2025tradeobi .

The first diagnostic layer computes the contemporaneous Pearson correlation between raw OBI values and traded returns over fixed evaluation windows. This scalar summary offers a baseline measure of linear association, though it remains symmetric, univariate, and sensitive to noise in high-frequency settings.

The second layer introduces a regime-based representation. Both OBI and returns are discretized into categorical bins and treated as multivariate counting processes. The association is quantified via two complementary diagnostics: the correlation between regime counts of OBI and the direction of price movement, and the autoregression adjusted $R^{2}$ from a multivariate regression where return regimes are predicted from OBI regimes. This representation stabilizes fluctuations, compresses extreme values, and transitions the signal toward an event based model structure.

The third layer evaluates causal influence using a multivariate Hawkes process. Regime labeled OBI and return events are treated as a joint point process, and the learned excitation kernel captures the directional influence of past imbalance on future price movements. The submatrix corresponding to OBI to return excitation is extracted, a diagonality weighted mask is applied, and a norm based score is computed to reflect both excitation strength and asymmetry.

Together, the three diagnostic layers isolate complementary dimensions of signal quality. Empirical results demonstrate consistent improvements across all layers under filtered event streams, with the most pronounced gains occurring in the Hawkes excitation scores, highlighting the alignment benefits introduced by structural filtration.

The remainder of this paper is organized as follows. Section 2 introduces the formal problem setting and outlines the structural filtration framework. We define three real-time observable filtering criteria, specify the temporal structure of evaluation and forecast windows, and present a consistent notation for describing the directional scoring objectives.

Section 3 describes the design of the scoring ladder, including the signal construction pipeline, the regime labeling scheme, and the precise definitions of the correlation, regression, and excitation-based diagnostics. Sections 4 and 5 present the empirical evaluation and results. We summarize statistical trends across filters, compare diagnostic scores across models, and demonstrate consistent gains in directional alignment from structurally filtered event streams.

The central objective of this study is to assess whether structural filtration of the limit order book, by removing short-lived, flickering, or rapidly modified orders, enhances the directional informativeness of flow-based indicators such as Order Book Imbalance (OBI). To this end, we develop a layered scoring framework that evaluates the association between OBI and short-term price returns under progressively richer structural representations. Each layer reflects a different perspective on signal clarity, ranging from raw co-movement to regime-aware causal influence.

The first layer in this framework examines the contemporaneous Pearson correlation between the raw value of the OBI signal and the mid-price return, measured over fixed evaluation windows. This metric is simple, interpretable, and widely used in practice. However, it is also limited: the correlation coefficient is symmetric, univariate, and highly sensitive to transient noise, especially in high-frequency settings where both OBI and returns exhibit significant short-term volatility.

Our primary interest lies in assessing whether the direction and magnitude of OBI are meaningfully associated with the direction and magnitude of returns, specifically, whether higher imbalance values systematically correspond to positive or negative price moves. While contemporaneous correlation offers a starting point, its reliance on pointwise matching between raw OBI and return values neglects structural variation across regimes. Moreover, by operating on raw values without classification, it fails to isolate whether specific levels of pressure, such as extreme buy or sell imbalance, behave differently from neutral states.

A further limitation arises from the way correlation is computed over fixed windows: it implicitly assumes that all observations within a window contribute equally to directional association. This averaging masks the heterogeneity of the underlying flow. In practice, a window may contain a mix of informative and uninformative events, but the correlation measure flattens their contributions. As a result, it may underestimate signal quality in windows where meaningful associations are diluted by high-frequency noise or ephemeral orders.

To overcome these limitations, the second layer shifts from value-based time series to regime-based count representations. Both OBI and return values are discretized into categorical regimes, for example, five bins for OBI and three for returns. Within each evaluation window, we construct count vectors that represent how frequently each regime appears. This transition to count data offers two advantages. It reduces sensitivity to short-lived fluctuations by emphasizing structural composition rather than raw magnitudes, and it aligns the representation more closely with point process models, where event counts naturally define the modeling object. These count vectors allow us to compute a correlation matrix between the occurrence frequencies of OBI and return regimes, revealing how directional pressure aligns with specific return outcomes. Additionally, we perform a multivariate linear regression where the return regime vector is regressed on the OBI regime counts, yielding a coefficient of determination $R^{2}$ that reflects the strength of structured association. To filter out artifacts introduced by serial dependence, we fit autoregressive models to each regime sequence, extract the residuals, and recompute the regression. This residualized $R^{2}$ isolates meaningful explanatory power beyond autocorrelation. Finally, by repeating this process across multiple lag offsets, we probe the short-term predictive content of filtered OBI regimes in explaining future return realizations.

The final layer in the scoring framework introduces a causal modeling perspective using a multivariate Hawkes process. Here, the regime-labeled OBI and return events are treated as components of a joint point process. We fit a parametric sum of exponentials excitation kernel, allowing for flexible estimation of how past events influence future occurrences across regime pairs. From the resulting kernel matrix, we extract the submatrix corresponding to OBI-to-return excitation, apply a diagonality-weighted mask to emphasize aligned regime transitions, and compute a norm-based score that captures both the magnitude and structural focus of causal flow. This diagnostic is uniquely suited to capturing the asymmetric, lagged dynamics that structural filtration is expected to clarify.

Raw-value correlation, regime-based alignment, and regime-to-regime excitation form a coherent diagnostic hierarchy. Each layer probes a different aspect of directional informativeness in filtered order flow. The first captures contemporaneous co-movement between imbalance and return. The second assesses whether structured regime transitions align in a statistically meaningful way. The third tests for lagged excitation from imbalance regimes to return regimes, reflecting causal structure. Our empirical results indicate that filtration improves score values across all layers. Correlation-based improvements are the most consistent, followed by moderate gains in regime alignment. Hawkes excitation scores improve only marginally. This pattern suggests that filtration sharpens structural association more reliably than it reveals causal directionality.

While structural filtration is designed to isolate meaningful order flow, no single scoring method can fully capture the multiple dimensions of directional informativeness. Raw-value correlation, regime-aligned association, and excitation-based scoring each probe distinct statistical and structural properties of the filtered signal. Correlation captures linear co-movement, but is insensitive to asymmetries and lacks temporal depth. Regression on regime counts introduces structural alignment and interpretability, while Hawkes-based excitation scores reveal causal influence patterns that emerge only once both regime and timing are accounted for. A multi-indicator scoring approach is therefore essential, not for redundancy, but to ensure that improvements in directional clarity are visible across independent, complementary axes of evaluation. We begin by introducing a set of core temporal and structural quantities defined at the order level. Let $t_{j}^{(1)}$ denote the entry time of order $j$, defined as the timestamp at which the order is first submitted to the book. Let $t_{j}^{(2)}$ denote its exit time, defined as the time at which it is either cancelled, fully executed, or replaced. The total time-in-book for order $j$ is given by:

This quantity is used to identify ephemeral orders that do not meaningfully interact with the market.

In addition to survival time, we define two modification-based measures. Let $M_{j}$ denote the number of modifications recorded for order $j$ during its lifetime. We also define $\mathcal{M}_{j}$ as the time between the last two modifications of order $j$, provided it was modified at least twice. The quantity $\mathcal{M}_{j}$ captures timing intensity in the order update stream and serves to flag aggressively re-priced orders.

These quantities form the basis of the filtration schemes presented next.

The raw event stream observed in high-frequency limit order books reflects a heterogeneous mixture of trading intents, ranging from genuine liquidity provision to strategic misdirection. Orders may be submitted and withdrawn within milliseconds, modified repeatedly, or canceled just before execution, often not to transact but to influence others’ behavior. To isolate signals grounded in execution-viable intent, we introduce a family of filtration schemes that remove structurally unreliable events based on real-time observable properties. These filters are designed to suppress the influence of ephemeral and strategically manipulated orders, thereby enhancing the fidelity of derived indicators such as Order Book Imbalance (OBI). Each filtration scheme focuses on a distinct structural marker, order lifetime, modification count, or modification timing, to achieve targeted suppression of noise.

Let $\epsilon_{t}\in\mathcal{E}$ denote the observed LOB event stream. A filtration scheme $\mathscr{F}^{(\cdot)}$ defines a rule-based removal of structurally unreliable events. We define three filters based on lifetime, modification count, and modification timing.

While lifetime-based filtering removes orders that vanish too quickly to exert real pressure, it does not address the behavior of persistently modified orders that remain in the book while constantly changing attributes. Orders with high modification counts may reflect strategic probing rather than genuine intent to trade. To suppress such adversarial patterns, we apply a second filter based on the number of post-submission modifications.

While modification count captures the intensity of changes over an order’s lifespan, it does not reflect how concentrated those changes are in time. Orders that undergo rapid, successive modifications just before cancellation often serve to spoof or mislead. The final filtration scheme targets such temporally clustered behavior by requiring a minimum separation between the last two modifications, thereby removing orders exhibiting tightly packed adjustment bursts.

To support interpretation of score behavior across filtration schemes, we employ the Order Book Imbalance (OBI) as an auxiliary, regime-defining indicator. Although not directly used in scoring, OBI provides a granular, tick-level measure of passive liquidity pressure that shapes directional signal clarity under various filters.

OBI is a well-established measure of passive liquidity imbalance in market microstructure literature. Empirical studies demonstrate that OBI is strongly associated with short-term price pressure and alpha generation cont2014price ; huang2015qmf ; hasbrouck2013latency . Its tick-level resolution allows seamless integration with Hawkes-based excitation analysis, while its ability to be averaged over fixed windows supports contemporaneous correlation frameworks.

To evaluate the directional informativeness of filtered order flow, we introduce a sequence of scoring functionals, each designed to quantify the strength and structure of association between directional signals, such as order book imbalance (OBI), and contemporaneous returns. The functionals are ordered by increasing structural sophistication, beginning with simple empirical association and culminating in event-level causal excitation analysis.

We begin with Pearson correlation, a familiar and computationally lightweight metric. It serves as a high-level diagnostic of whether filtered directional features track return fluctuations more closely than their unfiltered counterparts. However, correlation flattens out nuances by requiring time-synchronous aggregation and discards structural details that may lie in return regimes or flow asymmetries.

To address this, we next employ a discretized regime structure score. Here, both the returns and the directional signals are discretized into categorical regimes. By computing the coefficient of determination $R^{2}$ between indicator regime frequencies and return regimes within each sampling window, we capture whether specific OBI states are systematically linked to directional price moves. This formulation eliminates the need for fixed lags and emphasizes localized structural associations.

Building on this, we introduce a Hawkes-based scoring functional that models the return-OBI interaction as a multivariate point process. Unlike correlation or regression, this method accounts for asymmetric causal excitation between return regimes and flow regimes. The excitation kernels $\phi_{ij}$ describe how the occurrence of one type of event (e.g., an extreme OBI state) increases the likelihood of another (e.g., a sharp return). The learned excitation matrix is post-processed using a diagonally-weighted mask to quantify the clarity of directional causal flow, a novel contribution in this context.

Taken together, these scoring functionals form a layered evaluation framework. Each level allows the analyst to ask progressively finer questions. The comparison between correlation and discretized regime structure reveals whether a small subset of return regimes dominates the association signal. The jump from regression to Hawkes excitation exposes whether such associations are symmetric or directional, for example, whether extreme returns follow imbalance, or whether they excite further flow. This diagnostic ladder ultimately supports a more grounded interpretation of signal quality under each filtration scheme.

Each functional quantifies the association between returns and structural features derived from the order flow. These scores do not use the Order Book Imbalance (OBI) directly as an input but are later interpreted by conditioning on OBI regimes to assess the signal stability under varying liquidity pressure.

In addition to traditional book-derived OBI, we evaluate an alternative imbalance measure $\text{OBI}^{(T)}$ based exclusively on signed trade activity. This formulation, defined and justified in Section 3.1, constructs the imbalance signal from realized executions rather than standing book volume. The same filtration schemes are applied, and the resulting Hawkes excitation norms are reported in Appendix Table?9.

Unlike standard OBI, the trade-based formulation reveals a more pronounced variation across filters. For instance, the excitation norm under modification-time filtering (MTF) rises sharply to 24.7352 on January 23, compared to 9.6726 for standard OBI on the same day. Lifetime and modification-count filters also exhibit substantial gains (e.g., 15.8630 on January 13 under LF).

This result indicates that when OBI is constructed from trade-induced order flow, the signal is far more responsive to structural filtration. Specifically, the directional clarity extracted under MTF and LF translates into significantly higher causal excitation in return processes.

Filtering OBI based on observable event structure yields tangible improvements in associative strength, particularly under Pearson correlation and regime-wise cross-correlation. The modification-time filter (MTF) is consistently dominant across these layers. However, gains in causal excitation, as measured by Hawkes norms, remain modest when applied to standard OBI.

By contrast, when OBI is reconstructed from trade events alone, filtration yields markedly higher causal excitation scores, particularly under MTF and LF. This suggests that causal pathways from OBI to returns are more active when the imbalance signal is derived from executed trades, rather than inferred from book composition. In high-frequency settings where order-level noise and quote flickering obscure latent intent, realized flow may provide a more robust anchor for causality-based inference.